Subscribe To This Site
XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines
Home
Your FAQ & Stories
Legal Answers
Legal Forms
Legal Jobs
LawHubUSA Blog
Law Articles
Mesothelioma
Submit Articles
Submit Site
About Me
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Legal Disclaimer
Terms of Use

Medical Malpractice - Does An Ineffective Result Mean Malpractice Occurred?

Medical Malpractice Results

Medical Malpractice Results








Medical malpractice is a niche area of the general civil law field of negligence. It can be a complex area of law. One of the questions that arises from a more practical point of view is whether an ineffective treatment by a doctor constitutes malpractice?

The medical field has changed radically over the years. It wasn't that long ago patients believed their doctors could do no wrong. The commercialization of the medical care industry has changed that as much of the doctor-patient relationship has been interrupted. This has resulted in a rise in the number of medical malpractice cases being filed across the country.

So, does the result of a treatment mean that the doctor made a legal mistake? Well, anyone that watches medical dramas like House or ER probably knows the answer to that. It is no. Medicine has come a long way, but it is not a cure all for every health situation. Diagnosis can be difficult and so can treatments. The fact a treatment does not work is not per se an indication that malpractice has occurred. If it was, the medical field would be frozen into inaction because of a fear of being sued.

How then do we tell if a physician committed a legal wrong? The answer is in the process. Every condition presented to a medical professional calls for a minimum level of care that should be formed. In this case, the care would include everything from steps of diagnosis to actual treatment. This minimum level is known by the name "standard of care". So long as a doctor meets the minimum standard of care, he or she cannot be found to have committed malpractice regardless of whether the patient is cured or not.

The standard of care in any case is determined by expert testimony. The experts are doctors in the area who can testify as to what the minimum level of care should have been in the particular case. The defendant and plaintiff each designate an expert for this purpose. You will no doubt be shocked to learn that each tends to present a very different view of what the minimum is and whether the defendant doctor met it. How are these differences dealt with in court? A jury of individuals who have no medical training at all decide!

About the Author

Thomas Ajava writes for MetairieWrongfulDeathLawyer.com - your online resource for finding a Metairie wrongful death lawyer to assist with your case.

GoArticles.com





I built this successful website with SiteBuildIt!

Compare Web Hosts







Powered by LawGuru Answers




Legal questions answered at LawHubUSA
Ask an attorney at LawHubUSA
Online Legal Form at LawHubUSA
Online legal forms at LawHubUSA
Online Legal Opportunities at LawHubUSA
Legal Employment Jobs at LawHubUSA

Click here to post comments.

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Personal Injury Stories and FAQ
.